[SFRA-L] John Carter [sort of "of Mars"] redux
Damien Broderick
thespike at satx.rr.com
Mon Mar 26 19:13:19 EDT 2012
On 3/26/2012 6:01 PM, Richard Erlich wrote:
> One theory (or guess) I saw on line suggests that Disney had gotten
> burned on MARS NEEDS MOMS (2011) and recalled the bad success of even
> the respectable Brian De Palma MISSION TO MARS (2000) — and decided to
> downplay the Mars angle.
> There really is the rule in psychology of "Twice is always," so the
> theory/guess isn't totally implausible. Anyway, it's a definite fact
> that there's a rumor that the Martian omission was carefully calculated.
Apparently so. What's more--
Malcolm Edwards remarks:
>This fan trailer seems to me to do the job better than any of Disney's:
<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OzPVYy7LHIo>
and yes indeed. Splendid approach! If only... even now...
Damien Broderick
More information about the SFRA-L
mailing list