[SFRA-L] ANOTHER EARTH (was Re: "Getting it")
Damien Broderick
thespike at satx.rr.com
Thu Jan 19 14:02:34 EST 2012
On 1/19/2012 11:44 AM, Allen, Virginia [ENGL] wrote:
>On the question of what is "required" of Damien Broderick, please allow
me to clarify that as well. The "obligation" I spoke of was
rhetorical/grammatical. ... When someone claims personal injury at your
hands, you are "required" to apologize or launch into a tiresome defense
of how it wasn't your fault but his... <
I appreciate Virginia's defense, but I should briefly defend Pawel's
original comment in turn. I think it has been somewhat misconstrued.
I wrote at the outset:
<it seems likely to me that hardly anyone with well-trained sf
sensibilities will be able to watch this incredibly stupid movie
(ANOTHER EARTH ) without screaming repeatedly in pain.>
Pawel replied, in effect, that he--an sf critic and theorist--was not
affected in this way:
<I personally liked how it flows visually - whatever this makes me or my
sf sensibilities.>
That seemed to me a fair and even illuminating response to my somewhat
hyperbolic statement. Yes, there *are* in fact some people "with
well-trained sf sensibilities" who are not distressed by what I claimed
are stupid evasions of real-world consequences in the mise en scene.
I find Virginia's pomo bonobos quite entertaining as an analogy. I can
also report that my wife, trained in mathematics, architecture, law,
decision theory, and business management, and a novelist, could barely
force herself to watch the film all the way through, and complained
bitterly at the internal inconsistencies and physical absurdities of the
plot. It's not just pre-post-post literary fogies who feel this way. :)
Damien Broderick
More information about the SFRA-L
mailing list