[New-Poetry] Carol Ann Duffy gets the laurels
Bob Grumman
bobgrumman at nut-n-but.net
Sat May 2 22:51:00 EDT 2009
Judy Prince wrote:
> oh dear, and welcome back, Uche. I'm a relative newcomer to NP, but
> recall Robin having talked so well of you, of your being on NP some
> time ago.
>
> I've been wanting to like Carol Duffy's poems, really really wanting
> to like them. But I do not. Without using poetry jargon, I'll say
> that her work's pedestrian and 'reaches' hard to do poetic things. I
> do not feel that she's mediocre *because* she is popular or *because*
> she writes simply; these are not qualities that militate against
> excellent poetry.
>
> She gives no fresh-beauty collidings of words and images, and a reader
> feels as if it's necessary to help her along somehow whilst reading
> her poems. The Latin chanting of a train perhaps theoretically could
> work, but it actually fails frightfully. None of its called-up images
> works happily with the others. Here is a train chanting, and one
> thinks of nuns with rosary beads saying "Hail Marys" whilst rounding
> the tracks towards Houston Station. The little engine that could
> [pray in Latin]. Just not an image that evokes much besides an
> imminent train crash or ruler-slaps and paddlings, or for us in the
> USA, Sally Field in *The Flying Nun* nuisancely flying round the tracks.
>
> If Duffy has had editors, and surely she has, then WHAT WERE THEY
> THINKING, besides ignoring their job as editors? Did they say to
> themselves: "Aha! Just what the young folk want--simple stuff that
> passes as poetry! YES! Work up a study guide or two, a few lovely
> syllabi to tuck into those deliciously heavy backpacks!" And some of
> the editors had to be saying: "Do not touch her 'common touch'---it's
> pure, it's her, it's them, it's The New Something!"
>
> Again, I will say what I always say: writing good poetry's damned
> difficult.
>
> I have done a good poem or two and can't figure out how I did them.
> All the rest of mine are crap, tho hardwon crap. And I don't get
> better at it. I just get more aware of how awful it is.
>
> But folks---I'm not applying to be a Poet Laureate of anybody's
> country! However, now I think I might just go ahead and apply.
> P'raps in 10 years, with a nice polished new double citizenship [USA
> and UK], I'll be recognised as writing the New Something poetry and be
> in line to demand 600 butts of sack.
Yeeks, Judy, you think being recognized as "writing the New Something
poetry" will get you anywhere with bigTime awards-bestowers?!
--Bob
More information about the New-Poetry
mailing list