[New-Poetry] Bad blog reviews

[Judy Prince]

David, let me paste the Bob quote in again, as I think it's brill and funny.

To reprise the original discussion:  Schiavo and Schroeder nailed it,
scraping lotsa skin as they did, but hitting all the bases with a real
sensitivity to what makes some kinds of bad poetry.  Maybe S & S are the New
Bob Grumman.
Best,

Judy

Bob's lovely quote:  I wonder what poet admired by the establishment isn't
doing anything falsely considered new by the Establishment.

2009/3/9 Graham, David <GrahamD at ripon.edu>

> Noted.
>
> As for what others think of your syntax, or how they may take this little
> exchange, I'm all ears.
>
>
> David Graham Grahamd at Ripon.edu
> ------------------------
> Home page:
> http://web.mac.com/drjazz
>
> On Mar 9, 2009, at 9:09 PM, "Bob Grumman" <bobgrumman at nut-n-but.net>
> wrote:
>
>  David Graham wrote:
>
>
>
>
>  On Mar 9, 2009, at 8:16 PM, Bob Grumman wrote:
>
> I wonder what poet admired by the establishment isn't doing anything
> falsely considered new by the Establishment.
>
>  --Bob G.
> ===================
>
>
>
>  And I wonder which NewPoetry poster well known to everyone doesn't quite
> frequently not post anything that could be widely regarded negatively, if
> not completely confusing, syntax-wise.
>
>
>  ========================================
> David Graham
>
> Some of us aren't afraid to chance a little confusing syntax once in a
> while, although I don't think anyone reading New-Poetry posts would find my
> statement confusing.  Or anything like your attempt at a parody.
>
> --Bob G.
>
> ___________________________
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> New-Poetry mailing list
> New-Poetry at wiz.cath.vt.edu
> http://wiz.cath.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/new-poetry
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://wiz.cath.vt.edu/pipermail/new-poetry/attachments/20090310/6851b8e5/attachment.html