[New-Poetry] when metacriticism goes bad
Anny Ballardini
anny.ballardini at tin.it
Sun Feb 10 12:24:46 EST 2008
_I avant to be left a bone_
dadaist dog
----- Original Message -----
From: jforjames at aol.com
To: new-poetry at wiz.cath.vt.edu
Sent: Sunday, February 10, 2008 6:06 PM
Subject: Re: [New-Poetry] when metacriticism goes bad
"I avant to be left alone," said the diva poet.
-----Original Message-----
From: Halvard Johnson <halvard at earthlink.net>
Bcc: jforjames at aol.com
Sent: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 11:42 am
Subject: Re: [New-Poetry] when metacriticism goes bad
Or how about "post derriere" poets?--those who no longer guard
their rears. Or "post postal" poets?--those who no longer use the
mails to disseminate their works. Or "post toasties" poets?--those
who still eat those crispy little things. Or "post nasal drip" poets,
or . . .
Hal
"Music is continuous. Only listening
is intermittent."
--Henry David Thoreau
Halvard Johnson
================
halvard at earthlink.net
http://home.earthlink.net/~halvard/index.html
http://entropyandme.blogspot.com
http://imageswithoutwords.blogspot.com
http://www.hamiltonstone.org
http://home.earthlink.net/~halvard/vidalocabooks.html
On Feb 10, 2008, at 10:27 AM, JforJames at aol.com wrote:
I agree there's some good stuff in the give and take. Harriet a blog I often check in with, because it seems to make a point of having disparate set of characters doing blogging. Where else would you find A.E. Stallings, Major Jackson, Christian Bok, et al, in any sort of proximity or potential colloquy.
I resist the need to strictly define 'post avant' (and thus fence out certain poets) in such an early stage of its emergence. I know these categorizations can be useful in identifying trends and fashions, but it makes me crazy when people get territorial before time has a chance to settle things out a bit. The 'post' prefix, being a graft from 'post-modern' means or certainly implies a wide and unwieldy set of practices. So does the list of names matter as much as trying to identify some of the practices that might be in play under heading 'post avant'?
Pedigree also seems to matter too much. Or maybe it's like Adam getting to name the animals. Their can only be one Adam, it seems.
Finnegan
-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Lott <chris.lott at gmail.com>
Bcc: jforjames at aol.com
Sent: Sat, 9 Feb 2008 6:33 pm
Subject: Re: [New-Poetry] when metacriticism goes bad
On the whole, I found it to be quite an interesting discussion. I am
inclined to be averse to Mlinko based on some past correspondence,
which may be the source of my perception that she was basically
subjected to a good old-fashioned smackdown for about the first half
of the argument, then it took a strange turn that I don't really
understand and I no longer know what either she nor Shepherd think.
I see her as having an outsized and idealized view of writing poetry
as a historical political act. I'm sure she would point out how
misguided I am. Maybe it comes from being too young to have
experienced it and living in a time where that kind of thing is so
impossible as to seem that it must have ever been so. It seems to me
that when politics enters the picture, the poetry gets shoved out the
back door.
c
On Feb 8, 2008 6:00 PM, <jforjames at aol.com> wrote:
> http://poetryfoundation.org/harriet/2008/02/who_you_callin_postavant.html
>
> You wouldn't know a 'post avant' if one hit you in head.
>
> I was 'post avant' before you were a gleam in your mama's eye.
>
> Some of my best friends are 'post avants'.
>
> 'Post avant' up yours!
>
> ________________________________
> More new features than ever. Check out the new AOL Mail!
>
> _______________________________________________
> New-Poetry mailing list
> New-Poetry at wiz.cath.vt.edu
> http://wiz.cath.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/new-poetry
>
>
--
Chris Lott
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://wiz.cath.vt.edu/pipermail/new-poetry/attachments/20080210/4fe2823d/attachment.html
More information about the New-Poetry
mailing list