[New-Poetry] 100 Poets You Should Know
Bob Grumman
bobgrumman at nut-n-but.net
Thu Nov 22 07:47:09 EST 2007
Jason Quackenbush wrote:
> I prefer agendas that are clear and out in the open. It's the agendas
> of things like the original list which go largely unnoticed that i
> find unsettling.
But, Jason, the original list neutrally recorded the names of the 100
most visible American Poets (in James's view). I don't smell an
agenda. Each reader of the list is free to make of it what he will--I
as strong evidence of the importance of conformity for visibility,
others as strong evidence that there are only three kinds of valuable
poetry, Iowa Plaintext, Formal and Language. So what?
--Bob G.
More information about the New-Poetry
mailing list