[New-Poetry] Re: Bok, Goldsmith, et al
Crisman Cooley
ccooley at overdomain.com
Thu May 24 12:18:05 EDT 2007
I should be careful what I say. A few years ago one guy who used to
be on this list backchannelled me to say that Hal and I had destroyed
his life by talking about readymades. Never told you that Hal, did I?
If we're going to fight, Bob, we'll be on the same side because as a
religion, I prefer artistic creation to nihilism too. Dadaism,
though, is not nihilism. It began as a way of laughing at and
thereby mastering a world (just after WWI, and no less today) gone
mad. Many of its forms, including Goldsmith's, point to non-
creation. Of course, we must go on creating. No one will take our
toy bow and arrow away!
> Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 20:47:35 -0500
> From: "Bob Grumman" <bobgrumman at nut-n-but.net>
> Subject: Re: [New-Poetry] Re: Bok, Goldsmith, et al
>
>> Hal, agreed. This is the dadaist's, and especially Cage's, gift
>> to the
>> world. And if followed religiously (i.e., as one practices Zen)
>> it leads
>> out of artistic creation to continuous contemplation. For me,
>> anyway, I
>> have felt the need to absorb, to embrace, and to escape that trap.
>
> What trap? Artistic creation? Communicable artistic creation
> seems to me
> far superior to nihilism, but to each his own.
>
> --Bob
More information about the New-Poetry
mailing list