[New-Poetry] What is Poetry?

Jeff Newberry jeff.newberry at gmail.com
Mon Jul 2 11:33:13 EDT 2007


Thanks Steve.

Jeff

On 7/2/07, Mccall, Steven NAVAIR <steven.mccall at navy.mil> wrote:
>
> It's from a didactic poem of hers called <hmm hmm> "Poetry".
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: new-poetry-bounces at wiz.cath.vt.edu
> [mailto:new-poetry-bounces at wiz.cath.vt.edu] On Behalf Of Jeff Newberry
> Sent: Monday, July 02, 2007 10:55
> To: NewPoetry: Contemporary Poetry News &amp,Views
> Subject: Re: [New-Poetry] What is Poetry?
>
> Good point, Steve.  Do you have a source on that Marianne Moore quote?
> I'd love to read the essay(?) itself.
>
> Best,
> Jeff Newberry
>
>
> On 7/2/07, Mccall, Steven NAVAIR <steven.mccall at navy.mil> wrote:
>
>         Yes, "real poems" would feature an ATM machine.  Marianne Moore
> said,
>         "Poetry is imaginary gardens with real toads in them."  ATM
> machines
>         qualify as toads in my mind.
>
>         "In good art there is almost always a mystery which remains
> beyond
>         explanation."
>         ~ Dana Gioia
>
>
>
>         -----Original Message-----
>         From: new-poetry-bounces at wiz.cath.vt.edu
>         [mailto: new-poetry-bounces at wiz.cath.vt.edu
> <mailto:new-poetry-bounces at wiz.cath.vt.edu> ] On Behalf Of Jeff Newberry
>         Sent: Monday, July 02, 2007 10:33
>         To: NewPoetry: Contemporary Poetry News &amp,Views
>         Subject: Re: [New-Poetry] What is Poetry?
>
>         Jim,
>
>         I hadn't considered Jeffers' relationship to mystery.  Thanks
> for
>         pointing that out.
>
>         Jeffers is an interesting case.  Here are a couple of quotes
> from
>         Jeffers' scant prose (from The Selected Poetry of Robinson
> Jeffers, Tim
>         Hunt, ed.):
>
>         " . . . poetry is bound to concern itself chiefly with permanent
> things
>         and the permanent aspects of life [ . . . ] poetry must deal
> with things
>         that a reader two thousand years away could understand and be
> moved by."
>
>
>         This quote skirts close to Faulkner's "old verities."   Jeffers
> goes to
>         to clarify his meaning:
>
>         "This [emphasis on the permanent] excludes much of the
> circumstances of
>         modern life, especially in cities.  Fashions, forms of
> machinery, the
>         more complex social, financial, political adjustments, and so
> forth, are
>         all ephemeral, exceptional; they exist but will never exist
> again.
>         Poetry must concern itself with (relatively) permanent things.
> These
>         have poetic value; the ephemeral have only news-value."
>
>         I'm reminded, of course, of Pound's pithy dictum:  "Poetry is
> news that
>         stays news."  However, I don't know that Jeffers really means
> what he
>         says:  hasn't human society always had "complex social,
> financial, [and]
>         political adjustments?" (not sure what adjustments means in this
>         context, btw).  Is Jeffers arguing that a "real poem" (my loaded
> term)
>         would never feature an airplane, say?  Or an ATM machine?
>
>         Just a few thoughts.
>
>         Jeff Newberry
>
>
>         On 7/2/07, jforjames at aol.com < jforjames at aol.com
> <mailto:jforjames at aol.com>
>         <mailto:jforjames at aol.com> > wrote:
>
>                 Jackson's quote is a good one...though it's like so many
> quotes
>         that have some "certainty" in their saying.
>                 He's framing the battle for poetry's soul as 'either/or'
> or
>         'zero sum' matter. That poetry can live with unceartainty
>                 and indeterminancy should be pretty well established by
> now. It
>         seems to me that's much the fashion
>                 of poetry these days, particular post-avant poetry.
> Personally,
>         I wouldn't want to avoid a poetry strove,
>                 at times, for fixity and exactness. I think a poet is
> capable of
>         finding the stil-point amid the welter.
>
>                 It's curious that Jackson uses the verb
> 'illumine'...which means
>         to shed light, and more generally, to show cleary.
>                 So we 'illumine' what is obscure (mysterious,
> inscrutable,
>         etc.). The 'walls of mystery' made me think of Plato's wall
>                 within the cave. And living with 'doubt and uncertainty'
> is a
>         notion close to Socrates' notion of 'aphoria'. Then
>                 Jackson seems to veer off at end this quote with almost
> a nod to
>         someone like Robinson Jeffers (or eco-poetics),
>                 'with a return to elemental awe and wonder'. (Jeffers'
> sonnet
>         "Return, e.g.).
>
>                 No answers here...only observations.
>                 Finnegan
>
>
>
>
>                         It's the Negative Capability letter. To his
> brothers.
>
>                         *several things dove-tailed in my mind, and at
> once it
>         struck me what quality went to form a Man of Achievement,
> especially in
>         Literature, and which Shakespeare possessed so enormously - I
> mean
>         Negative Capability, that is, /when a man is capable of being in
>         uncertainties, mysteries, doubts, without any irritable reaching
> after
>         fact and reason/-Coleridge, for instance, would let go by a fine
>         isolated verisimilitude caught from the Penetralium of mystery,
> from
>         being incapable of remaining content with half-knowledge. *
>
>                         The thing is, poetry is kinda different from
> life. In
>         life, we probably have to reach after fact and reason pretty
> early on.
>         In poetry, we allow ourselves a little more time. We can be of
> three
>         minds, like a tree in which there are three blackbirds.
>
>                         I've asked this before, but since we're back to
> it
>         again...what is Keats saying about Coleridge? The conventional
> wisdom
>         seems to be that he's criticizing for a limitation -- I think
> he's
>         praising him for a superior quality. I suppose that to try and
> answer
>         this question might constitute an */irritable reaching after
> fact and
>         reason/, *but what the hey.
>
>                         Jeff Newberry wrote:
>                         > It's funny that you mention Keats, Mole. I've
> been
>         reading through > his letters. I'll try to track down the
> passage you
>         reference. I'm > pretty sure that I know what you're talking
> about.
>                         >
>                         > Jeff Newberry
>                         >
>                         > On 7/1/07, *TheOldMole* <Opus40-01 at opus40.org
> > <
>         mailto:Opus40-01 at opus40.org <mailto:Opus40-01 at opus40.org?> >>
> wrote:
>                         >
>                         > Keats kinda said the same thing.
>                         >
>                         > Jeff Newberry wrote:
>                         > > " . . . one of poetry's chief aims is to
> illumine
>         the walls of
>                         > > mystery, the inscrutable, the unsayable. I
> think
>         poetry ought to be
>                         > > taught not as an engine of meaning but as an
>
>         opportunity to learn to
>                         > > live in doubt and uncertainty, as a means of
>         claiming indeterminacy.
>                         > > Our species is deeply defined by its great
> surges of
>         reason, but I
>                         > > think it high time we return to elemental
> awe and
>         wonder."
>                         > >
>                         > > --Major Jackson, "Does Poetry Have a Social
>         Function," Poetry,
>                         > January
>                         > > 2007
>
>
>
>         ________________________________
>
>                 AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out more
> about
>         what's free from AOL at AOL.com
>         <http://www.aol.com?ncid=AOLAOF00020000000437> .
>
>
>                 _______________________________________________
>                 New-Poetry mailing list
>                 New-Poetry at wiz.cath.vt.edu
>                 http://wiz.cath.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/new-poetry
>         < http://wiz.cath.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/new-poetry
> <http://wiz.cath.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/new-poetry> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>         --
>         "Memory believes before knowing remembers.  Believes longer than
>         recollects, longer than knowing even wonders."
>         -William Faulkner, Light in August
>
>
>         http://museoffireblog.blogspot.com
>
>         _______________________________________________
>         New-Poetry mailing list
>         New-Poetry at wiz.cath.vt.edu <mailto:New-Poetry at wiz.cath.vt.edu>
>         http://wiz.cath.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/new-poetry
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> "Memory believes before knowing remembers.  Believes longer than
> recollects, longer than knowing even wonders."
> -William Faulkner, Light in August
>
>
> http://museoffireblog.blogspot.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> New-Poetry mailing list
> New-Poetry at wiz.cath.vt.edu
> http://wiz.cath.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/new-poetry
>



-- 
"Memory believes before knowing remembers.  Believes longer than recollects,
longer than knowing even wonders."
—William Faulkner, Light in August


http://museoffireblog.blogspot.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://wiz.cath.vt.edu/pipermail/new-poetry/attachments/20070702/b135b67c/attachment.html


More information about the New-Poetry mailing list