[New-Poetry] Grammatical

Chris Stroffolino cstroffo at earthlink.net
Fri Sep 1 19:18:20 EDT 2006


i think i would've agreed with this in 1986, and even up until around  
1996--
but around that time the jorie graham aesthetic kinda merged with the  
"language poetry" aesthetic
(taking kind of the least interesting aspects of both of them,
which generally happens with corporate mergers too)--
and now one has the
simply dull fragment,
alongside (vying with) dull exposition...but that's just the fashion  
biz..
luckily, there's always some others....you just gotta poke around...

On Sep 1, 2006, at 4:05 PM, Suzanne Burns wrote:

>
>
> On 9/1/06, David Graham <grahamd at ripon.edu > wrote:
>
> too much contemporary verse is simply dull exposition, to his eyes
>
> For me this is the heart of the matter-- I absolutely felt that way  
> about that period of time when everyone seemed to be writing the  
> same kind of narrative expository poem (usually autobiographical or  
> pseudo-autobiographical) and it was good to see a healthy rebellion  
> against that.  For me, running in the opposite direction helped my  
> growth.  I don't think I am the only person who has had that response.
>
> Suzanne Burns
> _______________________________________________
> New-Poetry mailing list
> New-Poetry at wiz.cath.vt.edu
> http://wiz.cath.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/new-poetry

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://wiz.cath.vt.edu/pipermail/new-poetry/attachments/20060901/d4052ab1/attachment.html


More information about the New-Poetry mailing list