[New-Poetry] MFA
jfq at myuw.net
jfq at myuw.net
Mon Oct 2 13:36:26 EDT 2006
Maybe you're right. I mean I'm completely open to the possibility that it's just confirmation bias having her wicked way with me. It's been on my list of things to do for some time to methodically test this impression and systematically see if I'm noticing something that's real or not, and then if I am seeing something real then see go from there to see if I can quantify MFAness a little more specifically. Unfortunately other things have taken priority and it's a pretty big research project.
That having been said, even if it means I'm wrong, I'll take a comparison to Mingus anyway I can get it.;)
On Mon, 2 Oct 2006, TheOldMole wrote:
> Remember back in the 1960s, when Charles Mingus, a great artist of
> extraordinary musical sensitivity, said something very similar about how he
> could always tell, by listening, whether a musician was black or white? Leonard
> Feather gave him a blindfold test, and Mingus failed it.
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: <jfq at myuw.net>
> To: "NewPoetry: Contemporary Poetry News & Views"
> <new-poetry at wiz.cath.vt.edu>
> Sent: Monday, October 02, 2006 11:00 AM
> Subject: Re: [New-Poetry] MFA
>
>
>> This is true, however, generally speaking, most reputable MFA programs are
>> full residency graduate courses that take two to three years and involve
>> workshops wherein a group of writers with baccalaureate degrees sit around
>> and critique eachothers work under the guidance of a more experienced
>> instructor. such instructors are generally MFA's themselves and teach as a
>> sideline to their own writing which is more often than not read by a very
>> small audience even compared to the rather pathetic numbers of most literary
>> fiction bestsellers.
>>
>> When I'm making generalizations about MFAs, that typical program, workshop,
>> and instructor is what I'm talking about.
>>
>> The need to make generalizations comes about because I find that when I'm
>> reading a poem in a new poetry magazine by a writer who I am unfamiliar
>> with, about two thirds of the time I can tell if that writer has an MFA
>> before reading his or her bio. by which I mean, I often read a poem that has
>> a certain MFAness about it, and maybe 3/4s of the time when I get that
>> feeling the writer has an MFA. Of course there are times when a writer
>> without an MFA writes a poem with a sense of MFAness, and there are times
>> when a writer with an MFA writes without MFAness, but the correlation is too
>> strong for me to ignore. So I tried to look at what was typical of MFA
>> programss that would give rise to MFAness (which, I should say, I dislike
>> quite a bit), and what I came up with were the criticisms of the way poetry
>> is studied in MFA programs below. I don't know how those factors correlate
>> to MFAness, nor am I really able to isolate the qualities that give a poem
>> its MFAness. Like obscenity, I know it when I see it, and it has thus far
>> eluded all my attempts to quantify it.
>>
>> That having been said, I think there are other ways of studying poetry. I am
>> a proud autodidact. Others I know that I think came at poetry from an
>> interesting place in their study of it studied comp lit, english lit, or
>> linguistics. Some do Bachelors of English with a focus on creative writing
>> and stop there, and I know a few people who've done that and been successful
>> in avoiding MFAness in their writing. Others get involved in the local
>> performance poetry scenes or theater, and get their education through a
>> growing oral tradition around those groups. Some of those options are also
>> open to MFA's, and I know a few MFA writers who balance their graduate work
>> with other forms of poetry study who seem to avoid the MFAness poison. Which
>> really i think is something that all poets should want.
>>
>> Is all I'm saying.
>>
>> On Mon, 2 Oct 2006, David Graham wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Not all MFA programs, instructors, or workshops are the same. Since the
>>> MFA
>>> can mean anything from a 3 year/60 credit hour experience to a
>>> correspondence course with a few brief "residencies," many generalizations
>>> are suspect.
>>>
>>> ====================================================
>>> David Graham
>>> grahamd at ripon.edu
>>> Home Page:
>>> http://www.ripon.edu/faculty/GrahamD/index.html
>>> Poetry Library:
>>> http://www.ripon.edu/faculty/GrahamD/poetrylib.html
>>> ====================================================
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> New-Poetry mailing list
>>> New-Poetry at wiz.cath.vt.edu
>>> http://wiz.cath.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/new-poetry
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> New-Poetry mailing list
>> New-Poetry at wiz.cath.vt.edu
>> http://wiz.cath.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/new-poetry
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> New-Poetry mailing list
> New-Poetry at wiz.cath.vt.edu
> http://wiz.cath.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/new-poetry
>
More information about the New-Poetry
mailing list