[New-Poetry] Bishop's drafts cause uproar
TheOldMole
tad at opus40.org
Wed Jun 14 04:05:12 EDT 2006
Well, not much can do Bishop any good at this point. Dead, and all.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael Snider" <mandolin at mac.com>
To: "NewPoetry: Contemporary Poetry News & Views"
<new-poetry at wiz.cath.vt.edu>
Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2006 7:20 PM
Subject: Re: [New-Poetry] Bishop's drafts cause uproar
>
> On Jun 13, 2006, at 6:21 PM, JforJames at aol.com wrote:
>
>> I haven't seen the whole Vendler argument against...has others
>> read it? (There is just about a paragraph or two on the New Republic's
>> online site.) Vendler seems to be arguing that the book is engaging
>> in 'false advertising'...that the pieces published in the _Edgar Allan
>> Poe_
>> collection were never meant to see the light of day. But it would seem
>> that the state of the manuscript copies, evidence from letters, the way
>> the material was organized, etc., should be able to tell a scholar or
>> careful editor something about how Bishop felt about an unpublished
>> piece.
>> And certainly there is precedence for books tracing the successive
>> drafts
>> of famous poems...so I don't know what the gripe would be about that.
>>
>> A poem, obviously a successive draft, organized with other
>> poems in similar state in a binder or folder of some kind, poems
>> sent in a letter to another poet (like M. Moore) for comment, etc.,
>> may very well be 'finished' (or abandoned per Auden via Valery)
>> but, for this or that reason remained unsuited for collection.
>> A few scribble lines from a notebook or on a lipsticked stained
>> cocktail napkin might be stretch to call 'unpublished'.
>> Finnegan
>>
>
> The entire review is online here: http://www.powells.com/review/
> 2006_04_06
>
> It seems entirely sensible to me; Iv'e looked though the boojk a number
> of times at bookstores and not bought it once--and I love Bishop's
> poetry. Of course particular scholars might need access to this sort of
> material, but I think it does Bishop no good.
>
> Mike S
> _______________________________________________
> New-Poetry mailing list
> New-Poetry at wiz.cath.vt.edu
> http://wiz.cath.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/new-poetry
>
More information about the New-Poetry
mailing list